Skip to main contentSkip to main content
Andrés Morales
Updated Sep 2026

Comparison

Make vs n8n in 2026: which automation platform fits your team?

Both run production workflows at scale. The right pick depends on whether your team writes code or wants a polished visual builder.

Last reviewed Sep 26, 2026

TL;DR

I've shipped 87 workflows on n8n since 2025 — 24 running daily. I've tested Make but never shipped one to production. Here's the honest comparison. n8n if your team writes code or wants self-hosting; Make if your team is non-technical and you want polish over flexibility. Both run production workflows at scale — pick by team, not by feature list.

REALITY CHECK

This workflow is running on my n8n right now

One of 87 workflows I run daily. Here's why it's on n8n and not Make.

Loop logic

1 splitInBatches node

This workflow loops over 100+ events per run. In Make the same loop needs 2 modules (iterator + bundle) and breaks the moment a record errors. n8n's split-in-batches handles that natively.

Cost model

Flat $20–50/mo infra

Self-hosted n8n = VPS only. Make Teams is $29/mo + $0.008 per operation. Same workflow at 6,000+ ops/mo costs roughly 2× on Make. As of Sep 2026.

Reliability

250+ successful runs in the last 10 days

No glue code, no module-level debugging. If a step fails, the loop pauses and I get one Slack ping. On Make the same setup needs a router + error handler chain.

Real workflow in production · Sync Events Cache · Runs every hour, syncs events to local cache

Comparison

Four criteria that actually decide it.

Pricing model
Per-operation; metered
Self-hosted free; cloud from ~$24/mo
n8n for teams that can self-host
Hosting
Cloud-only (Make-hosted)
Self-host or cloud
Tie — depends on ops capacity
Learning curve
Visual, easier for non-coders
Code-friendly, steeper for non-devs
Make for non-technical teams
Integrations
1,500+ apps in the catalog
400+ nodes, all open source
Make (volume); n8n (custom APIs)

01

Pricing — what you actually pay

Make bills per operation, so a workflow that fans out to five systems costs five credits per run. Heavy automations scale the bill faster than people expect. n8n is free when self-hosted; the cloud tier starts around $24/month with predictable per-execution pricing. If your team already runs its own infra, n8n is dramatically cheaper at scale.

02

Hosting and data residency

Make runs entirely on Make infrastructure. n8n can run on your laptop, a $5 VPS, or n8n Cloud. For LATAM teams with data residency requirements or sensitive customer data, self-hosting n8n removes a class of compliance questions before they start.

03

Learning curve — who can build workflows

Make is genuinely easier for non-developers; the visual editor is one of the best in the category. n8n rewards teams comfortable with code — JS expressions, HTTP nodes, and a real data flow concept — and is steeper for pure no-code users. Hiring signals matter: if your team is half developers, n8n compounds; if not, Make ships faster.

Comparison

Pick Make when… vs Pick n8n when…

Pick Make when…

  • Your team is mostly non-technical and you need to ship automations this week.
  • You want a polished UI and the widest catalog of pre-built app integrations.
  • You can model the cost as a predictable operations line item.

Pick n8n when…

  • Your team writes code and you want full control over logic and data.
  • You need self-hosting for data residency, cost, or compliance reasons.
  • You plan to integrate with custom APIs or build reusable components.

Comparison

FAQ

+Is n8n really free?

Yes, if you self-host it. The fair-code license lets you run, modify, and keep your workflows without paying n8n. n8n Cloud plans start around $24/month and remove the ops work of hosting it yourself.

+Does Make scale for production workloads?

Yes. Make runs in production at companies processing millions of operations per month. The ceiling is operational cost and governance, not capability — plan your credit budget the same way you would any cloud bill.

+Can I migrate from Make to n8n (or vice versa)?

Yes, but workflows do not port directly. Both tools import and export JSON; plan one to two weeks of rebuild time per major workflow, plus testing. Keep credentials out of the migration scope — export them once and reuse.

Need help deciding?

A 30-minute call is enough to know which platform fits your team, your stack, and your budget. No pitch — just a clear recommendation.

Book a scoping call →

Last reviewed Sep 26, 2026

Ready to scale without the chaos?

Stop doing by hand what AI can do in seconds. Let's map your first workflow on a 30-min call.

Book a free strategy call
AI Automation · UI/UX · Production

Ship the thing.Skip the boilerplate.

Independent practice based in Cali. Automation flows, hand-built UI, and end-to-end web — for teams that would rather have it done than debate it.

Let's talk
2,014Est. 2014

From intake to deploy, the studio keeps work in one place: scope, design, build, ship. Briefs land on the desk, deliverables land on the client.

Andrés Morales

Book a free 30-min callor send a brief